Summary / Zusammenfassung
Error in AAO logic. Territorial jurisdiction Level 1 does not cover all required equipment materials from Level 2. However, the suggestion only considers territorial jurisdiction, even though Level 2 should have been applied.
QUESTION: Would it be possible to duplicate your productive control center so that you can test such changes before integrating them into the productive control center? This would also be a great way to test APIs (e.g., POI-Explorer) without risking damage to the productive control center? I have already asked this question twice over the last 2 weeks via the support button, but have not received a response. This would be very useful and helpful for testing in a kind of “sandbox”.
Steps to Reproduce / Schritte zur Reproduktion
- Call your test control center CGDISLST
- Create an operation as noted in the pdf.
- According to the keyword (Level 2), at least 2 HLFs should be suggested. Only one is suggested, even though others would be available.
Expected Behavior / Erwartetes Verhalten
When the option “Check equipment despite territorial jurisdiction” is enabled, Level 2 should also be checked and suggested by distance if needed.
In this case, KÄERJENG-PÉITENG-HLF21 should have been suggested as well to cover the equipment requirements.
Actual Behavior / Tatsächliches Verhalten
That’s not what happens
Impact on Usage / Auswirkung auf die Nutzung
Minor: Small / cosmetic impact. / Kleiner / kosmetischer Einfluss.
Moderate: It disrupts some workflows. / Beeinträchtigt einige Arbeitsabläufe.
Critical: I can’t use the platform at all. / Die Plattform ist nicht nutzbar.
Screenshots or Logs / Screenshots oder Protokolle
Suggestion-26066686-20260616-171300.pdf (144,7 KB)
